The Dangers of Provisional Patent Applications

Provisional applications used to be the very firstsuch, the specification and the drawings must be
step of the patent application process. Provisionalcomplete.
applications were typically written by the inventorOne of the main reasons that people used to
and then sent over to the USPTO.  Sometimes,prefer provisionals over non provisional patent
these  provisionals were proof read by a patentapplication is the idea that they can put off a large
attorney even though they were incomplete.  Asamount of the cost. Moreover, it used to be
a result, inventors would save time and money.thought that they can get your foot in the door a
Unfortunately,case law now requires thatlot quicker, and then you will be patent pending a
provisional patent applications be completelylot sooner.
enabling and nearly match up word for word withThe fact is that provisional patent applications
their non provisional counterparts.should only be able to save 20-25% of the
The main problem with Provisional applications isattorney’s fees if done properly.  The
the fact that all of the enabling information has toreason for this is that most of the attorney’s
be provided in the provisional.  And thisfees are directed to the specification and
provisional must match up with a high degree ofdrawings.  And for many patent attorneys, the
similarity with the non provisional in order to be inspecification is broadly outlined from the claims to
pendency.  If this requirement is not met, thenbegin with.
the subsequent patent will not be enforceable atFor these reasons, in the event that you do
trial.choose to use a provisional you need to make
The concept of Enablement requires that thesure you have an experienced patent attorney
patent show all the pieces, steps, anddraft the provisional.  The application must include
embodiments necessary to teach one skilled inall of the embodiments, parts that an ordinary
the art how to make and use the invention. Asnonprovisional would include.