Sensory-Based Plasticity

A major contribution regarding sensory-basedThese lessons were not lost on Taub, who
plasticity came from the work of a team ofeventually survived his legal ordeals with PETA
neuroscientists in California. In 1996, Michael M.and the Maryland court system and ended up at
Merzenich, PhD, a professor emeritusthe University of Alabama, Birmingham. Meanwhile,
neuroscientist at the University of California, Sanhowever, his interest had shifted to concerns
Francisco and his colleagues reported that whenregarding how neuroscience discoveries can help
the arms and fingers of monkeys werestroke victims. Since portions of the brains of
exercised, the related areas of the motor cortexstroke victims die due to a failure of the vascular
began to expanded radically, taking over areassystem to provide oxygen, Taub's concern was
that had previously controlled other parts of theirwhether the lessons from the deafferentation
bodies. This alone overturned the dogma thatresearch could be used to enhance the lives of
stated that the adult brain cannot change. Hepeople who survived. His subsequent research and
insisted that the experiences of life sculpt theclinical work sought to find out if unused (or under
brain and retain imprints of experiences andutilized) sectors could re-learn and take over
performed behaviors. He said, "These idiosyncraticservicing the functions of damaged sector(s).
features of cortical representation have beenThe conclusion from Taub's efforts became
largely ignored by cortical electrophysiologists."controversial since it violated conventional wisdom
If use stimulates the growth of neural networks,related to the treatment of stroke survivors. Up
would the opposite also be true? Would disuseto that point the typical treatment was to train
destroy networks? Certainly, this would follow thethem how to compensate for the lost capabilities.
basic tenet of Hebbian Learning. The answer forSince many neuroscientists still believed that the
this came from another non-neuroscientist. Inbrain had no developmental potential after age 25,
1981, Edward Taub, PhD, a research psychologistcompensation was considered the only alternative.
in charge of the Institute for Behavior Research inRegardless, Taub developed a new approach that
Silver Spring, Maryland, was deafferenting (i.e.he called "constraint-induced movement therapy. "
severing the sensory nerve) on monkeys' arms.For instance, if a patient's right arm function had
This meant that the applicable section of thebeen destroyed by a stroke, his clinicians would
somatosensory cortex of a monkey's brain wasrestrain the left arm. This forced the brain to
not receiving input from their fingers, hands, orattempt to re-activate the abilities for the brain to
arms. The goal was to find out how this affectedonce again control and use the right arm. As the
the corresponding part of the brain.related somatosensory area was unavailable, the
Due to legal problems initiated by People for theonly option was for the brain to reorganize and
Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), it took untilre-install the right arm sensing and controlling
January 14, 1990 - when the last of first of thefunction to another set of neurons somewhere
Silver Spring monkeys was euthanized - beforeelse in the brain. The belief here is that as a result
anyone obtained any appreciable results fromof the pruning or differentiation - which occur
Taub's research. Neuroscientists led by Pons andduring the first 26 months of life - and/or the
Mishkin sought to discover how the monkey'snegative aspect of Hebbian Learning, dormant or
brain had reorganized after twelve years ofunder utilized neural networks exist and may be
deafferentation. What they discovered wasavailable to take over the relocated function. This
astounding. When they brushed the monkey'sis like saying that mentally, humans carry around
face, the deafferentation zone tingled withneurological "spare tires", which are available when
electrical activity. In fact, even a light touching ofneeded. Taub's further research and clinical
the camel hair brush produced vigorous neuronalexperience showed that stroke victims can
responses in what was suspected to be a silentbenefit from constraint therapy. This overturns
zone. What they discovered is that the face zonethe still ascribed to belief that the brain cannot
of the somatosensory cortex had intruded intorestructure after the 25th year of life.
the hand and arm zone.