| The Patent Cooperation Treaty is an agreement | | | | 2. The description first repeats the title of the |
| for international cooperation in the field of patents. | | | | invention. It then specifies the technical field to |
| It is the most significant advancement in | | | | which the invention relates. It indicates the |
| international cooperation in this field since the | | | | so-called “background art,” that is, the |
| adoption of the Paris Convention itself. It is, | | | | technical and, in particular, patent literature, |
| however, largely a treaty for rationalization and | | | | pertaining to that technical field, constituting the |
| cooperation with regard to the filing, searching and | | | | “prior art” or “state of the art” or |
| examination of patent PCT applications and the | | | | known technology for the newly filed application. It |
| dissemination of the technical information | | | | discloses the intention in a way, which allows the |
| contained therein. The PCT does not provide for | | | | technical problem and its solution to be |
| the grant of “international patents”. The | | | | understood. It states the advantageous effects |
| task and responsibility for granting patents remain | | | | of the invention as compared with the known |
| exclusively in the hands of the patent Offices of, | | | | technology. It briefly describes the figures in the |
| or acting for, the countries where protection is | | | | drawings. It sets forth the best mode |
| sought (the “regional Offices”). PCT is a | | | | contemplated by the applicant for carrying out |
| special agreement under the Paris Convention | | | | the invention and any other mode he wants to |
| open only to states, which are also party to the | | | | include. |
| Paris Convention. The PCT does not compete | | | | Finally, it indicates the way in which the invention is |
| with but, in fact, complements the Paris | | | | capable of exploitation in industry.d) Sequence |
| convention. | | | | Listing: - |
| Introduction: | | | | 1. Section 806 of PCT allows a designated Office |
| On 7th September 1998, India deposited its | | | | to require that a copy of a sequence listing part |
| instrument of accession to the PCT and on 7th | | | | filed only on an electronic medium under new |
| December 1998 thus became a member of the | | | | Section 801 be furnished, for the purposes of the |
| PCT, as the 98th Contracting State of PCT. | | | | national phase, on paper. |
| Furthermore, nationals and residents of India are | | | | 2. For applicants who do not wish to file the |
| entitled to file international applications for patents | | | | sequence listing part of their international |
| under PCT at Receiving Office at Patent Office at | | | | applications under new Section 801, the current |
| Delhi. | | | | provisions will continue to apply, including the filing |
| Principal Objectives of the PCT | | | | in written form only (under Rule 5.2) and the |
| The principal objective of the PCT is to simplify | | | | concurrent or subsequent furnishing, as provided |
| and to render more effective and more | | | | under PCT Rule 13ter and Section 208, of the |
| economical—in the interests of the users of | | | | sequence listing parts in computer readable from |
| the patent system and the offices that have | | | | but only for the purposes of international search |
| responsibility for administering it—the | | | | and/or international preliminary examination. In |
| previously established means of applying in several | | | | such cases the current system for calculating the |
| countries for patent protection for inventions. | | | | basic fee, on the basis of the total number of |
| Before the introduction of the PCT system, | | | | sheets of the international application including the |
| virtually the only means by which protection of an | | | | sequence listing part, will continue to apply (see |
| invention could be obtained in several countries | | | | item 1(b) of the Schedule of Fees). |
| was to file a separate application in each country; | | | | 3. It is important to note that international |
| these applications, each being dealt within isolation, | | | | application filed under new section 801 may only |
| involved repetition of the work of the filing and | | | | be filed with receiving Offices, which are prepared |
| examination in each country. | | | | to accept them, and on such electronic media as |
| To achieve its objective, the PCT: | | | | specified by the receiving Offices (for further |
| - Establishes an international system which enables | | | | details pl. see PCT Applicant’s Guide).e) Claims: |
| the filing, with a single patent Office (the | | | | 1. The claims must define the subject matter of |
| “Receiving Office”), of a single application | | | | the invention for which protection is sought. They |
| (the “International Application”) in one | | | | must be clear and concise and fully supported by |
| language having effect in each of the countries | | | | the description. |
| which are party to the PCT which the applicant | | | | 2. With respect to the structure and drafting of |
| names (“designates”) in his application; | | | | claims, the PCT requirements are largely similar to |
| - Provides for the formal examination of the | | | | what is accepted in most patent Offices.f) |
| International Application by a single patent Office, | | | | Drawings: |
| the Receiving Office; | | | | The drawings are only required where they are |
| - Subjects each International Application to an | | | | necessary for the understanding of the invention. |
| international search which results in a report citing | | | | This will be the case for an engineering type of |
| the relevant prior art (mainly published patent | | | | invention. It will not be the case when an invention |
| documents relating to previous inventions) which | | | | cannot be drawn, as is the case for a chemical |
| may have to be taken into account in deciding | | | | product. Here again, the requirements are similar |
| whether the invention is patentable; that report is | | | | to those of most patent Offices.g) Abstract: |
| made available first to the applicant and is later | | | | 1. The abstract is intended to serve the purpose |
| published; | | | | of technical information. The Treaty says clearly |
| - Provides for centralized international publication | | | | that it cannot be taken into account for any other |
| of International Applications with the related | | | | purpose. This means in particular that it cannot be |
| international search reports, as well as their | | | | used for the purpose of interpreting the scope of |
| communication to the designated Offices; and | | | | the protection sought. |
| - Provides the option of an international preliminary | | | | 2. The abstract consists of a concise summary of |
| examination of the International Application, which | | | | the disclosure of the invention as contained in the |
| gives to the Offices, that has to decide whether | | | | description, claims and drawings in preferably |
| or not to grant a patent, and to the applicant, a | | | | within 50 to 150 words. It must be drafted in a |
| report containing an opinion as to whether the | | | | way, which allows the clear understanding of the |
| claimed invention meets certain international | | | | technical problem, the gist of the solution of that |
| criteria for patentability. The procedure described | | | | problem through the invention, and the principal |
| in the preceding paragraph, comparing it with the | | | | use of the invention.h ) Language of filing |
| traditional procedure, is illustrated by two timelines | | | | 1. The International Application must be filed in the |
| such as chapter I and chapter II of PCT. It is | | | | language, or one of the languages, which the |
| commonly called the “International Phase” | | | | Receiving Office accepts for that purpose (Rule |
| to describe the first part of the patenting | | | | 12.1(a)). If the application is filed in any receiving |
| procedure, whereas one speaks of the | | | | office in India it has to be either in English or Hindi. |
| “National Phase” to describe the last part | | | | Neither the Treaty nor the Regulations enumerate |
| of the patent granting procedure which, as | | | | the languages in which International Applications |
| explained in paragraph above, which is the task of | | | | may be filed. Whether a given language can be |
| the designated Offices, that is, the national Offices | | | | used depends on the readiness of the Receiving |
| of, or Regional offices acting for the countries | | | | Office to accept International Applications in that |
| which have been designated in the International | | | | language. Each Receiving Office must, however, |
| Application. (In PCT terminology, a reference to | | | | accept at least one language for the filing of |
| “national” Office, “national” phase | | | | International Applications which is both a language |
| and “national” fees, includes the reference | | | | accepted by the International Searching Authority |
| to the procedure before a regional patent Office). | | | | or, if applicable, by at least one International |
| Under the PCT system, by the time the | | | | Searching Authority, competent for the |
| International Application reaches the national | | | | international searching of International Applications |
| Office, it has already been searched by the | | | | filed with that Receiving Office and one of the |
| International Searching Authority and possibly | | | | languages of publication (that is, Chinese, English, |
| examined by an International Preliminary Examining | | | | French, German, Japanese, Spanish or Russian), so |
| Authority, thus providing the national patent | | | | that applicants always have the option of filing the |
| Offices with the important benefit of reducing | | | | international search or international publication |
| their work loads since they have the benefit of | | | | purposes; in other words, either words, either the |
| these international phase procedures and thus | | | | International Application in its original language or |
| need not duplicate those efforts. Further | | | | the translation will be sufficient for the processing |
| objectives of the PCT are to facilitate and | | | | by the Receiving Office, for international search |
| accelerate access by industries and other | | | | and for international publication. |
| interested sectors to technical information related | | | | 2. If the language of filing of the International |
| to inventions and to assist developing countries on | | | | Application is the one acceptable by the Receiving |
| gaining access to technology. | | | | Office but is not accepted by the International |
| Functions of The Receiving Office | | | | Searching Authority, the applicant is required to |
| 1. The first step is that the Receiving Office | | | | furnish, within one month from the date of |
| receives the International Application from the | | | | receipt of the application, a translation into a |
| applicant. An patent PCT application for the same | | | | language which is all of the following: (i) a language |
| invention has to be filed six weeks or necessary | | | | accepted by the International Searching Authority |
| permission under section 39 should be taken | | | | that is to carry out the international search; (ii) a |
| before the filing of International Application. | | | | language of publication; and (iii) a language |
| 2. The second step is that the Receiving Office | | | | accepted by the Receiving Office (unless the |
| checks the International Application to determine | | | | International Application is filed in a language of |
| whether it meets the prescribed requirements as | | | | publication) (Rule 12.3). |
| to form and content of International Applications. | | | | 3. If the language of filing of the International |
| This check is of a formal nature only and does | | | | Application is accepted by the Receiving Office |
| not go into the substance of the invention. It | | | | and the International Searching Authority but is |
| therefore extends only to a certain number of | | | | not a language of publication (at present, this is |
| rather elementary requirements specified in the | | | | the case only where the International Application |
| Treaty as forming part of that check. | | | | is filed in Dutch and certain Nordic languages), the |
| 3. i) The receiving Office shall accord as the | | | | International Application will be published in English, |
| international filing date the date of receipt of the | | | | the translation into that language being prepared |
| international application, provided that that Office | | | | under the responsibility of the International |
| has found that in order in accordance with Article | | | | Searching Authority which undertakes the search |
| 11, at the time of receipt:ii) (a) If the receiving | | | | (see Rule 48.3). |
| Office finds that the international application did | | | | 4. The request must always be filed in a language |
| not, at the time of receipt, fulfill the requirements | | | | that is accepted by the Receiving Office and |
| listed in paragraph (1), it shall, as provided in the | | | | which is also one of the seven languages of |
| Regulations, invite the applicant to file the required | | | | publication |
| correction. | | | | International Search. |
| (b) If the applicant complies with the invitation, as | | | | A high quality international search report is |
| provided in the Regulations, the receiving Office | | | | established by the International Searching |
| shall accord as the international filing date the date | | | | Authority. For the purpose of Indian applicant |
| of receipt of the required correction. | | | | following are Competent International Searching |
| 4. Receiving Office checks certain formal and | | | | Authorities( ISAs) |
| physical requirements (Article 14). | | | | Austrian Patent Office (AT) |
| That check by the Receiving Office may show | | | | Australian Patent Office (AU) |
| that the International Application does not meet | | | | European Patent Office (EP) |
| certain requirements as to form and content and | | | | China Intellectual Property Office (CN) |
| that the fees are not, or not fully, paid. In that | | | | United States Patent & Trademark Office |
| case, the Receiving Office communicates with the | | | | (US) |
| applicant in order to give him an opportunity to | | | | Swedish Patent Office (SE) |
| correct any defect. | | | | 2. If the International Application did not claim any |
| 6. If the language of filing of the International | | | | priority, the international search report is available |
| Application is one acceptable by the Receiving | | | | within nine months from the international filing |
| Office but is not acceptable by the International | | | | date, If priority is claimed, that report is available |
| Searching Authority that is to carry out the | | | | usually during the 16th month from the priority |
| international search, the applicant is required to | | | | date. Even where priority is claimed, the |
| furnish, within one month from the filing date of | | | | international search report is normally available in |
| the application, a translation into a language which | | | | time before publication of the International |
| is all of the following: (i) a language accepted by | | | | Application. This allows time for the applicant to |
| the International Searching Authority that is to | | | | withdraw the application before publication, if |
| carry out the international search; (ii) a language | | | | desired. |
| of publication; and (iii) a language accepted by the | | | | PCT FEES (may vary from time to time) |
| Receiving Office (unless the International | | | | Receiving Office (RO/IN) (The Patent Office, |
| Application is filed in a language of publication). In | | | | Kolkata, New Delhi, Mumbai and Chennai) |
| cases where the applicant fails to furnish, within | | | | Transmittal fee: INR 2,000 [for individual(s)] , INR |
| the applicable time limit, a translation for the | | | | 8,000 [for legal entity]ii. International Fee: USD |
| purposes of international search, the Receiving | | | | 1134* USD 1211 (from 1-3-2005)iii. Supplement per |
| Office invites the applicant to furnish the missing | | | | sheet in excess of 30: USD 12* USD 13 (from |
| translation, in certain cases subject to the | | | | 1-3-2005) |
| payment of a late furnishing fee. A separate | | | | (* Amounts on 1 February 2005 unless otherwise |
| invitation procedure is provided for the case | | | | indicated).iv. Search fee: (Amounts on 1 February |
| where the request does not comply with language | | | | 2005, unless otherwise indicated) |
| requirements. Where the applicant does not | | | | ISA/AT – USD 182 USD 214** |
| furnish the missing translation within the time limit | | | | ISA/EP – USD 1920** USD 2,075* |
| fixed in the invitation, the International application | | | | ISA/AU – USD 865 |
| will, subject to certain safeguards for the | | | | ISA/CN – USD 181 |
| applicant, be considered withdrawn and the | | | | ISA/US – USD 1000 USD 300*** |
| Receiving Office will so declare. | | | | ISA/SE – USD 1920 USD 2,075*vi. Fee for |
| 7. Not all the requirements of the International | | | | preparing certified copy of priority document and |
| Application are required to be examined by the | | | | transmission of the same to IB |
| Receiving Office. For instance, the Receiving | | | | INR 1,000 [for individual(s)] INR 4000 [for legal |
| Office does not deal with substantive questions | | | | entity] |
| such as whether the disclosure of the invention in | | | | (* from 15-3-2005, |
| the application is sufficient and whether the | | | | ** from 1-3-2005) |
| requirement of unity of invention is complied with. | | | | Failure to pay fees or underpayment of fees can |
| It also does not check all the many detailed | | | | be corrected under Rule 16b. An invitation to |
| physical requirements of the International | | | | pay missing amounts will be issued by the |
| Application. Those requirements are only checked | | | | Receiving Office. Payment can be made later, |
| to the extent that compliance with such | | | | together with a late payment fee. |
| requirements is necessary for the purpose of | | | | (*** -- Refer PCT Fee Tables [Footnotes to Fee |
| reasonably uniform international publication. | | | | Tables Para.18]) |
| 8. Typical examples of defects, which may be | | | | An Indian applicant, filing an International |
| corrected without affecting the international filing | | | | Application for Patent under Patent Cooperation |
| date, are: | | | | Treaty, is required to remit the consolidated |
| – Non-payment or partial payment of fees; | | | | amount in US Dollar by Demand Draft, payable to |
| – Lack of signature of the request; | | | | the Controller of Patents at State Bank of India, |
| – Lack of a title of the invention; | | | | New York Branch, for payment towards basic |
| – Lack of an abstract; | | | | fee, designation fee and search fee.The required |
| – Physical defects. | | | | fees, which must be paid to receiving office, are |
| 9. As stated, in all such cases lack of correction | | | | the Transmittal Fee, the International Fee and the |
| leads to the application being considered | | | | Search Fee. They must all be paid to the |
| withdrawn, except where a physical defect would | | | | Receiving Office. |
| not prevent reasonably uniform international | | | | The Transmittal Fee is for the benefit the |
| publication and except for the payment of fees. | | | | Receiving Office. It is intended to compensate |
| With regard to the later, Rule 16b provides that | | | | that Office for the work, which is required to be |
| the Receiving Office must invite the applicant to | | | | performed in connection with the International |
| pay the missing fees together with a late | | | | Application. The amount is left to be fixed by the |
| payment fee. If the applicant still does not pay | | | | Receiving Office. It is due within one month from |
| the fees within the time limit fixed in the invitation, | | | | the date of receipt of the International Application. |
| the Receiving Office will declare that the | | | | The International Fee is for the benefit of the |
| International Application is being considered | | | | International Bureau. It is intended to cover the |
| withdrawn. This solution protects the applicant | | | | cost of the work the International Bureau must |
| against any loss of his application due to an | | | | perform under the PCT. The amounts are fixed in |
| erroneously delayed or incomplete payment of | | | | the Schedule of Fees, which forms part of the |
| fees. | | | | regulations. The international fee is due within one |
| 10. The third step in the procedure before the | | | | month from the date of receipt of the |
| Receiving Office is that it must transmit the | | | | International Application. The Search Fee is for the |
| “record copy” of the International | | | | benefit of the International Searching Authority. It |
| Application to the International Bureau and the | | | | is intended to compensate that Authority for the |
| “search copy” to the International | | | | work it must perform in connection with the |
| Searching Authority. The Receiving Office keeps a | | | | establishment of the international search report. It |
| third copy, the “home copy.” The | | | | is due within one month from the date of receipt |
| transmittals do not take place if and as long as | | | | of the International Application. The amount is |
| national prescriptions concerning national security | | | | fixed by the International Searching Authority. |
| apply. The Receiving Office will then declare that | | | | Withdrawal of the application |
| national security provisions prevent the | | | | An International Application can be withdrawn at |
| International Application from being treated as | | | | any time during the international phase. Where the |
| such. | | | | intent of the withdrawal is to prevent publication, |
| 11. The Receiving Office must mail the record | | | | the notice of withdrawal must reach the |
| copy promptly to the International Bureau and in | | | | International Bureau before technical preparations |
| any case not later than five days prior to the | | | | for international publication have been completed |
| expiration of the 13th month from the priority | | | | (that is, not later than 15 days before the date of |
| date. In many cases, the International Application | | | | publication). |
| claims the priority of an earlier national application | | | | 2. A withdrawal of an International Application can |
| and is filed at the end of the 12-month priority | | | | be made with the condition that the withdrawal |
| period; the Receiving Office has only a few | | | | be effective only if the international publication can |
| weeks for its processing tasks | | | | still be prevented. |
| 12. The search copy must be transmitted by the | | | | Amendments: |
| Receiving Office to the International Searching | | | | 1.The claims can be adjusted to the results of the |
| Authority at the time of the transmittal of the | | | | international search report by amending them |
| record copy to the International Bureau except | | | | once (under Article 19) with effect in all |
| where the search fees has not been paid on time, | | | | designated States. Such amendments save costs |
| in which case the transmittal of the search copy | | | | for preparation of different sets of amendments |
| takes place after that fee has been paid. | | | | and for local agents filing such amendments |
| 13. If an applicant who is a resident or national of | | | | before designated Offices, and guarantee better |
| a PCT Contracting State; erroneously files his | | | | provisional protection and patents in registration |
| International Application with a national office | | | | countries. Individual amendments before each |
| which acts as a Receiving Office under the | | | | designated Office are also permitted in the |
| Treaty but which is not competent under Rule | | | | national phase (under Article 28 or 41) and all |
| 19.1 or 19.2, having regard to the applicant’s | | | | parts of the application can be amended (under |
| residence and nationality, to receive that | | | | Article 34(2)) during the international preliminary |
| International Application, or if an applicant files his | | | | examination procedure under Chapter II. |
| International Application with the competent | | | | International Preliminary Examination (Optional) |
| Receiving Office in a language which is not | | | | The following are Competent International |
| accepted by that Office under Rule 12.1(a) but is | | | | Preliminary Examining Authorities [IPEAs] for the |
| in a language accepted under that Rule by the | | | | purpose of Indian applicant:] |
| International Bureau as Receiving Office, the | | | | Austrian Patent Office (AT) |
| International Application will be considered to have | | | | Australian Patent Office (AU) |
| been received by the national Office on behalf of | | | | European Patent Office (EP)(only if ISA was AT, |
| the International Bureau as Receiving Office on | | | | EP or SE) |
| the date on which it was received by the national | | | | China Intellectual Property Office (CN) |
| Office, and will be promptly transmitted to the | | | | United States Patent & trademark office |
| International bureau as Receiving Office (unless | | | | (US) |
| such transmittal is prevented by national security | | | | Swedish patent Office (SE) |
| prescriptions). The transmittal may be subjected | | | | 2. The use of International Preliminary Examination |
| by the national Office to the payment of a fee | | | | (i) Is optional for the applicant; |
| equal to the transmittal fee. All other fees already | | | | (ii) Provides, in addition to the international search |
| paid to that Office will be refunded by that Office | | | | report, an international preliminary Examination |
| to the applicant and the applicable fees will have | | | | report containing an opinion on the usual criteria of |
| to be paid to the International bureau as Receiving | | | | patentability before expenses are incurred for the |
| Office | | | | national phase (for translation, fees and foreign |
| The following conditions should be fulfilled for | | | | agents); |
| according an international filing date: | | | | (iii) Helps the applicant to adapt the International |
| The applicant should be a resident or national of | | | | Application to the results of the international |
| the Contracting State for which the Receiving | | | | search report; |
| Office acts, and has consequently the right to file | | | | (iv) Allows, with effect for all elected Offices, the |
| with that Receiving Office (note, however, that | | | | amending of all parts of the International |
| the International Application is to be transmitted | | | | Application (description, claims and drawings) during |
| to the International Bureau as Receiving Office | | | | international preliminary examination; |
| under Rule 19.4(a)(i) if that condition is not fulfilled); | | | | (v) The international preliminary examination |
| (ii) The International Application should be in the | | | | report gives, for minimal cost, an opinion and the |
| language, or one of the languages, accepted by | | | | probability of obtaining a patent: |
| the Receiving Office for the purpose of filing | | | | (viii) The application will be more or less ready for |
| International Applications (note, however, that the | | | | acceptance by the elected Offices after receiving |
| International Application is to be transmitted to | | | | international preliminary examination report. |
| the International Bureau as Receiving Office under | | | | (ix) If the report is negative and it is decided to |
| Rule 19.4(a)(ii) if that condition is not fulfilled); | | | | abandon the application, the applicant has saved all |
| (iii) The International Application should contain at | | | | the expenses otherwise incurred before the |
| least the following elements: (a) an indication that | | | | elected Offices for the payment of national fees, |
| it is intended to be an International Application, (b) | | | | the preparation of translations and the |
| the designation of at least one Contracting | | | | appointment of local agents. |
| State(c) the name of the applicant in a form | | | | Preliminary examination fees (Amounts on 1 |
| allowing the applicant’s identity to be | | | | February 2005 unless otherwise indicated) |
| established, (d) a part which on the face of it | | | | IPEA Preliminary examination fee Handling fee |
| appears to be a claim or claims. | | | | (CHF 200) |
| (iv) If one of these requirements is only complied | | | | AT EUR 159 EUR 129 |
| with after correction, the international filing date | | | | AU AUD 550 1000** AUD 218 |
| will be the date on which the correction was | | | | CN CNY 1,500 CNY eq CHF 200 |
| received. In other words, in these cases a defect, | | | | EP EUR 1,530 EUR 129 |
| which is corrected later, affects the international | | | | SE SEK 5,000 SEK 1,160 |
| filing date. If all such defects are not properly | | | | US USD 600 USD 162 173 (From 1-3-2005) |
| corrected, the application will not be treated as an | | | | (** Refer PCT Fee Tables (footnotes to Fee |
| International Application. | | | | Tables para.20.) |
| (v) For all the other cases, non-compliance with | | | | The National Phase |
| the formal requirements does not affect the | | | | 1) The national phase follows the international |
| international filing date. In other words, if the | | | | phase. In the national Phase before processing and |
| applicant corrects a defect in such cases, the | | | | examination in the designated or elected Offices, |
| international filing date remains unchanged. If the | | | | the applicant must perform certain acts thereby |
| applicant does not correct, the defect properly, | | | | effecting “entry into the national phase.” If |
| the International Application will, however, be | | | | the applicant does not enter the national phase, |
| considered withdrawn by the Receiving Office. | | | | namely, if he does not perform these acts within |
| Extension of the time limit fixed by the Receiving | | | | the prescribed time limit, the International |
| Office for the correction of defects under Article | | | | Application loses its effect in the designated or |
| 14 may be requested. | | | | elected States concerned with the same |
| Monitoring of time limits | | | | consequences as the withdrawal of any national |
| Easy supervision and monitoring of only a few | | | | application in that State (Article 24). |
| time limits and events is required by applicants, | | | | 2. For entry into the national phase before a |
| namely: | | | | designated or elected Office (if Preliminary |
| (i) Monitoring the receipt of the confirmation of | | | | examination is undertaken and countries elected), |
| receipt of the International Application by the | | | | it is necessary that the national fee be paid to it |
| Receiving Office; | | | | and, where the International Application has not |
| (ii) Monitoring the time limits for payment of fees; | | | | been filed or published in the official language, or |
| (iii) Checking the notification from the International | | | | one of the official languages of that Office, a |
| Bureau confirming the receipt of the International | | | | translation into an official language be filed. The |
| Bureau confirming the receipt of the record copy | | | | time limits for entry into the national phase are, in |
| (Form PCT/IB/301) for correctness of the | | | | some Offices, even longer than 31 months. |
| designations indicated on the Form and if needed | | | | 3. The national fees to be paid are usually same |
| and confirm precautionary designations within 15 | | | | as the fees required for the filing of a national or |
| months from the priority date;] | | | | regional application. Some Offices, not in India |
| (iv) Deciding, after receipt of the international | | | | however, levy lower national or regional filing, |
| search report, whether or not to file a demand | | | | search or examination fees, or refund certain |
| for international preliminary examination (which | | | | fees, on account of the existence of the |
| must be filed prior to the expiration of 19 months | | | | international search report or where an |
| from the priority date. | | | | international preliminary examination report has |
| (v) Deciding, after receipt of the international | | | | been established. This offsets, at least partly, the |
| search report, whether or not to file amended | | | | costs of filing an International Application. |
| claims under Article 19, within the applicable time | | | | 4. Where the original drawings are of a good |
| limit; This will usually be considered only if demand | | | | quality, the applicant is not required to file |
| for international preliminary examination is not | | | | additional formal drawings with the Designated or |
| filed; | | | | Elected Offices, permitting substantial economies |
| (vi) Monitoring the receipt, during the 19th month | | | | in some cases. It is therefore important to file |
| from the priority date, of the notice from the | | | | drawings with the Receiving Office that fully |
| International Bureau (Form PCT/IB/308) that the | | | | comply with the format requirements of the |
| publication of the International Application and its | | | | Regulations under the PCT. |
| communication to the designated Offices (Article | | | | 5. Where the priority of an earlier application is |
| 20) has been effected; (vii) entering the national | | | | claimed and a certified copy of that application has |
| phase before the expiration of 30/31 months | | | | been provided, it is not necessary to submit a |
| from the priority date by paying the national fees | | | | certified copy of the priority document to each |
| and furnishing (if required) a translation of the | | | | designated or elected Office. The International |
| International Application. | | | | Bureau sends any required copies of the priority |
| Filing of the International Application:a ) Request | | | | document to the Offices concerned. |
| form (PCT/RO/101) | | | | Legal Remedies; Protection against Loss of Rights |
| 1. International Application must be filed with any | | | | Where, as a result of a mistake which was not |
| of the receiving offices i.e. Patent office, Kolkata, | | | | timely corrected, an International Application is |
| New Delhi, Mumbai, and Chennai(RO/IN) or | | | | considered withdrawn, the applicant may request |
| International bureau (RO/IB) of WIPO. The | | | | review of that decision by each of the designated |
| request form and the documents attached | | | | Offices. In addition to requesting review, the |
| therewith should be in triplicate. | | | | applicant has the opportunity to submit at the |
| 2. The International Application must contain a | | | | same time, to each designated Office, a request |
| request, a description, one or more claims, one or | | | | for excuse of failure to comply with a time limit. |
| more drawings (where required) and an abstract; | | | | The legal basis of, and the conditions for, such a |
| it must comply with the prescribed physical | | | | request are to be found in the applicable national |
| requirements; it must be in one of the prescribed | | | | law or regional convention, which applies equally to |
| languages; finally, the required fees must be paid. | | | | International Applications. Where that law or |
| These requirements will be dealt with one by one. | | | | convention provides for reinstatement, this can be |
| 3. The request may be made on a printed form, | | | | requested. Where there is a possibility of |
| copies of which can be obtained free of charge | | | | requesting further processing of the application, |
| from the Receiving Office or from the | | | | this can also be done. Procedural safeguards are |
| International Bureau of WIPO. The request may | | | | thus available in each designated State to PCT |
| also be presented as a computer printout as | | | | applicants in the same way, as they are to |
| prescribed by Section 102(h) of the Administrative | | | | applicants for national or regional applications not |
| Instructions or, alternatively, as a computer | | | | made via the PCT. |
| printout prepared using the PCT-SAFE | | | | Preparation of Patent Applications |
| (PCT-EASY) software, in which case it must be | | | | 1. Any patent application, drafted in accordance |
| accompanied by a computer diskette containing a | | | | with the requirements of the PCT, allows a |
| copy in electronic form of the data contained in | | | | maximum flexibility and benefit from the |
| the request and of the abstract. Online application | | | | advantages of the PCT: |
| filing also is possible now. | | | | (i) The same application documents can then be |
| 4. The request must first of all contain a petition, | | | | used for filing national and/or SJinternational |
| that is, a request that the International Application | | | | applicants; |
| be processed according to the PCT. It must | | | | (II) No adaptation of the original application is then |
| further contain the title of the invention, the | | | | required in a much as the PCT format is valid for |
| necessary data concerning the applicant, the | | | | all designated Offices (including the EPO, the |
| inventor and the agent representing the applicant. | | | | Japanese Patent Office and the United States |
| It must be signed by the applicant or his agent. | | | | Patent and Trademark Office). |
| Where there are two or more applicants, each | | | | Fee savings. National fees are reduced or |
| applicant must sign at his choice either the | | | | completely dispensed with for the procedure |
| request or, if the request is signed by an agent, a | | | | before some Offices which provides considerable |
| separate power of attorney. | | | | savings, for example: |
| 5. The request may contain some optional | | | | European Patent Office (EPO): – |
| indications, in particular a priority claim according to | | | | European search fee waived if international search |
| the Paris Convention for the Protection of | | | | report by AT, EP, ES, SE; 20%reduction of |
| Industrial Property.b) Priority | | | | European search fee if search report by AU, CN, |
| 1. Only one certified copy is required of each | | | | JP, RU, US; – 50%reduction of European |
| priority of the application and to be furnished | | | | examination fee if international preliminary |
| within 6 months from the filing date; no copies for | | | | examination report by EP. |
| each designated Office are needed. The copies | | | | German Patent Office: |
| for the designated Offices are prepared—at no | | | | – Filing fee waived if the Office was the |
| additional cost to the applicant—by the | | | | Receiving Office; |
| International Bureau. | | | | – Examination fee reduced if an international |
| 2. Transmittal of the priority document need not | | | | search report has been established. |
| be monitored if a request for transmittal by the | | | | Hungarian Patent Office: |
| Receiving Office to the International Bureau of an | | | | – Filing fee waived if the Office was the |
| application filed with that Receiving Office was | | | | Receiving Office; |
| made in the Request Form and the applicable fee | | | | Japanese Patent Office: |
| for a priority document was paid to the Receiving | | | | – Approximately 80% reduction of |
| Office.c) Description | | | | examination fee if international search report |
| 1. The description of the invention in the | | | | established by JPO; |
| International Application must disclose the | | | | – Approximately 20% reduction of |
| invention in a manner sufficiently clear and | | | | examination fee if international search report |
| complete for the invention to be carried out by a | | | | established by ISA other than JPO. |
| person skilled in the art. | | | | |