Liver Ascites

Ascites is the presence of excessive fluid withinperipheral arteriolar vasodilation, particularly within
the peritoneal cavity. Individuals with ascitesthe splanchnic arterial bed.
develop physical examination findings of increasingThe resultant reduced arterial vascular resistance
abdominal girth, a fluid wave, a ballotable liver, andis associated with decreased central filling
shifting dullness. Ascites can develop in patientspressures, decreased renal arterial perfusion,
with conditions other than liver illness, includingreflex renal arterial vasoconstriction, and increased
protein-calorie malnutrition (from hypoalbuminemia)renal tubular sodium resorption. Retention of salt
and cancer (from lymphatic obstruction).expands the intravascular amount, which
In patients with liver disease, ascites is due toexacerbates portal venous hypertension.
portal hypertension. It's helpful to recognize thatThe imbalance between hydrostatic versus
liver disease with ascites formation occurs in aoncotic pressure in the portal vein results in
broad clinical spectrum. At a single end is fullyascites formation. Even though the splanchnic
compensated portal hypertension with no ascitesvasodilatation hypothesis accounts for many from
present simply because the amount of ascitesthe findings in ascites formation, the use of
generated is much less than the around 800-1200transhepatic intrajugular portal-to-systemic
mL/d capability from the peritoneal lymphaticshunting (Ideas) as a signifies of decompressing
drainage.the portal vein in patients with ascites provides a
In the other extreme is the typically fatalcounterargument.
hepatorenal syndrome, in which patients with liverAs a result of the procedure, peripheral arteriolar
disease, generally with massive ascites, succumbvasodilation seems to improve (perhaps
to rapidly progressing acute renal failure. Theconsequently of shunting of vasodilators such as
hepatorenal syndrome appears to becomenitric oxide which are usually cleared by the liver),
precipitated by intense and unacceptable renalhowever ascites is usually dramatically improved.
vasoconstriction and is characterized by severePeople who support the overflow hypothesis have
salt retention standard of prerenal azotemia butproposed how the primary event within the
within the absence of true volume depletion.improvement of ascites is inappropriate renal salt
Nonetheless, the presence of clinically apparentretention.
ascites in a patient with liver disease is connectedIn this view, ascites may be the consequence of
with poor long-term survival. Over the manyoverflow of fluid from the intravascular
years, various mechanisms have been proposedvolume-expanded portal system to the peritoneal
to explain ascites formation. No single hypothesiscavity. But what triggers the inappropriate renal
of pathogenesis easily explains all findingssalt retention? A single possibility is that there
whatsoever points in time during the organicmight exist a hepatorenal reflex by which
history of portal hypertension. Portal hypertensionelevated sinusoidal stress triggers increased
and unacceptable renal retention of salt aresympathetic tone or endothelin-1 secretion.
important elements of all theories.Either of these pathways could cause an
The end result of ascites happens when excessunacceptable degree of renal vasoconstriction, a
peritoneal fluid exceeds the capacity of lymphaticdecrease in glomerular filtration rate, and, by
drainage, primary to increased hydrostatictubuloglomerular feedback, salt retention. Note
pressure. The fluid can then be observed to visiblythat endothelin-1 is both a renal vasoconstrictor
weep from the lymphatics and pool within thealong with a stimulant of epinephrine secretion,
abdominal cavity as ascites. The underfillwhich in turn stimulates more endothelin-1
vasodilatation hypothesis proposes that the mainsecretion.
event in ascites formation is vascular, withAlternatively, it's possible that an as yet
reduced efficient circulating amount leadingunidentified product in the diseased liver interferes
towards the activation of the renin-angiotensinwith atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) action at the
system and subsequent renal sodium retention.kidney or is in some other way responsible for an
The classic underfill hypothesis postulates thatinappropriate increase in renal sodium retention.
elevated hepatic sinusoidal pressure leads toSupporters from the overflow hypothesis point to
sequestration of blood in the splanchnic venousthe fact that numerous cirrhotic individuals have
bed. This outcomes in underfilling of the centralsodium handling defects within the absence of
vein with diversion of intravascular volume to theascites and do not have a measurable increase in
hepatic lymphatics, which, like the central vein,renin-angiotensin activity.
drain the space of Disse.However, studies have shown that the renal salt
The peripheral arterial vasodilatation or splanchnicretention in these individuals could be reversed by
vasodilatation hypothesis adds the concept that,the use of an angiotensin II receptor antagonist.
with portal-to-systemic shunting, vasodilatoryMost most likely, multiple mechanisms contribute
items (eg, nitric oxide) that are normally clearedto the development of ascites and to its
by the liver are instead delivered towards theperpetuation, worsening, or improvement in
systemic circulation, exactly where they triggerdiverse clinical situations.