Design Patent Law India

Design patent design patent law firm India Andesign. The foreigner can apply for the
article is distinguished not only by its utility but alsoregistration of the design. However, the
by its visual appeal which too usually play anconvention followed is that if a country does not
important role in shaping the buyers preferenceoffer the identical registration right to Indian citizen
for the article. Therefore, the design of an articlefor their designs in their country, its citizen would
and even design of its packaging is importantnot be eligible to apply for registration of design in
from the commercial view point.India. design patent design patent law firms delhi
Since the enactment of the Design Act, 1911The application under Section 5 shall be
considerable progress has been made in the fieldaccompanied by four copies of representation of
of science and technology. The legal system ofthe design and the application shall state the class
the protection of industrial design requires to bein which the design is to be registered. The
made more efficient in order to ensure effectiveapplicant is also to file a brief statement of
protection to registered design. It is also essentialnovelty with the application. There are 31 classes
to promote design activity in order to promoteplus miscellaneous class 99 of goods. The
the design element in an article of production. Theprocedure for registration of a design is
Design Act, 2000, after repealing the Act of 1911comparatively simple when compared to
aims at the protecting the design in India andprocedure for registration of a patent and
bringing the Indian law at par with Internationaltrademark.a) Submission of applicationb)
law.Acceptance / objections / refusalc) Removal of
A design can be registered only when it is new orobjections / appeal to central Governmentd)
original and not previously published in India. ADecision of Central Governmente) Registration of
design would be registrable if the pattern thoughthe design
already known is applied to new article. ForThe exclusive right conferred on a design is
example, the shape of teddy bear if applied totermed as copyright in design. It should not be
school bag would be registrable. It is necessaryconfused with exclusive right granted for literary
that the design must be new with respect to theand artistic work also termed a copyright in the
class of the article to which it has been applied. Aliterary and artistic work. There are certain
combination of previously known designs can bedesigns which can qualify for registration both
registered if the combination produces a newunder the Design Act and Copyright Act. The
visual appeal.industrial design and product design are covered
The novelty or originality is to be judged on theby Design Act, 2000, if the design has been
evidence of expert in the trade. An expert who isregistered under this Act, it can not be protected
aware of what is common trade knowledge andby the Copyright Act even though it may be an
usage in the class of goods to which the design isoriginal artistic work. If the design qualifies for
applied would be the once entitled to pass theregistration under Design Act but has not been
verdict on the novelty and originality. The designregistered under Design Act, the exclusive right
must appeal to and judged solely by the eye. Thewill subsist under the Copyright Act. If such design
visual appeal of the article must be to the eye ofis of an article which is commercially produced,
the customer.the copyright over the design under Copyright
The design must not be previously published inAct will cease to exist when the article to which
India. To constitute publication, a design must bedesign has been applied is reproduced more than
available to the public or it has been shown orfifty times by an industrial process by the owner
disclosed to some person who is not bound toof the copyright.
keep it secret. The private or the secret use orThere is an overlapping area of the applicability of
an experimental use of a design will not constitutethe Design Act and Copyright Act but they can
publication by prior use. In the case of Wimconot be applied at the same time for protection of
Limited versus Meena Match Industries, the Highthe same subject matter. Section 11 of Design
Court held that the disclosure even to one personAct lays down the term of the copyright in design
is sufficient to constitute publication.is ten years which can be extended to further
As per Section 5 of Design Act, 2000, any personsecond period of five years making it total fifteen
who claims to be the proprietor of any new oryears.
original design can apply for the registration of the