Medical Device Manufacturer Fights FDA Over Defective Product Recall

A New Jersey-based company that makeswant to avoid lengthy court battles and the
tissue-based products used in open-heartnegative publicity associated with such episodes.
surgeries is embroiled in a heated court battle andBut not these device makers, recent news
war of words with the Food and Drugreports say. In 2005, the FDA demanded a recall
Administration (FDA). This tension betweenfrom Utah Medical Products, Inc., a Salt Lake City
Shelhigh and the FDA began April 17 when themanufacturer of a variety of medical devices
federal regulatory agency pulled about 1 millionused in obstetrics, gynecology, neonatal intensive
parts at the company's plant in New Jersey aftercare, urology, electro-surgery and blood pressure
a 10-week inspection of the facility in the fall ofmonitoring.
2006.As with Shelhigh, FDA inspectors said the Utah
According to the civil complaint that the FDA filedcompany was not complying with federal quality
in the U.S. District Court in Newark, the companycontrol standards and demanded a recall. But Utah
violated several federal safety manufacturingMedical fought the recall and won what was
standards. FDA officials say that theconsidered an improbable victory against the
manufactured products were placed in a poorlyfederal agency. The FDA did not appeal that court
constructed and maintained clean room, thatdecision.
Shelhigh did not properly inspect the products forIn the case of Shelhigh, however, there are some
possible microbial contamination, that they did notother facts that have come to light. According to
follow procedures to test products for sterilitya May 16 article in the Star-Ledger, court papers
and that the company was not able toshow Spanish regulators last month
scientifically support their product expiration dates.recommended that surgeons in that country
These products include pediatric heart valves,consider not using Shelhigh products because of
conduits for blood flow, surgical patches, arterialproblems in 1997 with seven pericardial patches
grafts and annuloplasty rings for repairing heartand three incidents involving the company's heart
valves. FDA officials said that since these devicesvalves, two of them fatal.
were placed in seriously ill patients their sterility isLast week, Shelhigh suffered a setback when a
absolutely vital to prevent infection in thosefederal judge declined to release the products in
patients. An FDA press release states thatFDA's possession. The judge said in a five-page
Shelhigh's own records indicate that a number ofopinion that he could not determine whether the
sterility test failures occurred and that its testingdevices met those standards without first holding
and retesting procedures were not properlya hearing. The judge assured Shelhigh's attorneys
carried out, but Shelhigh officials are saying that isthat he would set the date for such a hearing
not true.soon and also encourage the opposing sides to
In fact, Shelhigh managers are taking anengage in mediation and arrive at a settlement.
aggressive stance against the FDA allegations andShelhigh attorneys are pushing for a quick decision
have indicated that they aren't giving in any timebecause the company gets 70 percent of its
soon. They vehemently deny that there issales from exports. They say the company could
anything wrong with their products, a majority ofgo belly up and lay off its 50 employees if it
which is exported to European countries such ascannot satisfy the demands of its overseas
Italy and Spain. Company officials say the FDAdistributors. Attorneys for the company also say
lacks evidence to prove that the products havethat Shelhigh is "clinging to its life" and bankruptcy
malfunctioned or caused any injuries or fatalities inis looming large.
patients. Shelhigh valves are reportedly used inExperts who have watched FDA actions in the
heart patients of all age groups - infants, olderpast, say Shelhigh's fighting stance is extremely
children, adults and seniors.risky. The FDA, they say, has the power to put a
Shelhigh defied a formal FDA request earlier thiscompany out of business and that the regulatory
month to recall these products. Shlomo Gabbay,agencies in Europe and the United States are
the company's CEO and chief science officer,more in tune with each other now than they
says his company "has no intention to initiate thewere ever before.
recall," according to an article published in the NewAmong the products that the FDA asked that
Jersey Star-Ledger, which has been following theShelhigh recall, include the following:
latest developments in this saga very closely. TheMedical devices manufactured by Shelhigh include:
newspaper quotes Gabbay, who maintains thatPericardial Patch, No-React Pericardial Patch,
the FDA has no facts to support its claims againstNo-React PneumoPledgets, No-React VascuPatch,
his company.No-React Tissue Repair Patch/UroPatch, Pulmonic
"The FDA should understand that it must proveValve Conduit No-React Treated, No-React Dura
its allegations before it can make a request andShield, BioRing (annuloplasty ring), No-React EnCuff
their newest statements do not provide anyPatch, No-React Stentless Valve Conduit, Internal
further factual support for their claims," he toldMammary Artery, Gold perforated patches, Pre
the Star-Ledger.Curved Aortic Patch (Open), NR2000
Apparently, this defiance on the part of Shelhigh isSemiStented aortic tricuspid valve, BioConduit
reflective of a trend. While drug makers are quickstentless valve, NR900A tricuspid valve, MitroFast
to recall a defective drug, device manufacturersMitral Valve Repair System, BioMitral tricuspid
are more contentious. Drug companies usuallyvalve and Injectable Pulmonic Valve System.