How health care system works


rubiconmed.com keyword stats



Most current MSN search phrases:

protect youR assests from siezure  

Medical Device Manufacturer Fights FDA Over Defective Product Recall

A New Jersey-based company that makesDrug companies usually want to avoid lengthy
tissue-based products used in open-heartcourt battles and the negative publicity
surgeries is embroiled in a heated courtassociated with such episodes. But not these
battle and war of words with the Food anddevice makers, recent news reports say. In
Drug Administration (FDA). This tension2005, the FDA demanded a recall from Utah
between Shelhigh and the FDA began April 17Medical Products, Inc., a Salt Lake City
when the federal regulatory agency pulledmanufacturer of a variety of medical devices
about 1 million parts at the company's plantused in obstetrics, gynecology, neonatal
in New Jersey after a 10-week inspection ofintensive care, urology, electro-surgery and
the  facility  in  the  fall  of  2006.blood  pressure  monitoring.
According to the civil complaint that the FDAAs with Shelhigh, FDA inspectors said the
filed in the U.S. District Court in Newark,Utah company was not complying with federal
the company violated several federal safetyquality control standards and demanded a
manufacturing standards. FDA officials sayrecall. But Utah Medical fought the recall
that the manufactured products were placed inand won what was considered an improbable
a poorly constructed and maintained cleanvictory against the federal agency. The FDA
room, that Shelhigh did not properly inspectdid  not  appeal  that  court  decision.
the products for possible microbial
contamination, that they did not followIn the case of Shelhigh, however, there are
procedures to test products for sterility andsome other facts that have come to light.
that the company was not able toAccording to a May 16 article in the
scientifically support their productStar-Ledger, court papers show Spanish
expiration  dates.regulators last month recommended that
surgeons in that country consider not using
These products include pediatric heartShelhigh products because of problems in 1997
valves, conduits for blood flow, surgicalwith seven pericardial patches and three
patches, arterial grafts and annuloplastyincidents involving the company's heart
rings for repairing heart valves. FDAvalves,  two  of  them  fatal.
officials said that since these devices were
placed in seriously ill patients theirLast week, Shelhigh suffered a setback when a
sterility is absolutely vital to preventfederal judge declined to release the
infection in those patients. An FDA pressproducts in FDA's possession. The judge said
release states that Shelhigh's own recordsin a five-page opinion that he could not
indicate that a number of sterility testdetermine whether the devices met those
failures occurred and that its testing andstandards without first holding a hearing.
retesting procedures were not properlyThe judge assured Shelhigh's attorneys that
carried out, but Shelhigh officials arehe would set the date for such a hearing soon
saying  that  is  not  true.and also encourage the opposing sides to
engage in mediation and arrive at a
In fact, Shelhigh managers are taking ansettlement. Shelhigh attorneys are pushing
aggressive stance against the FDA allegationsfor a quick decision because the company gets
and have indicated that they aren't giving in70 percent of its sales from exports. They
any time soon. They vehemently deny thatsay the company could go belly up and lay off
there is anything wrong with their products,its 50 employees if it cannot satisfy the
a majority of which is exported to Europeandemands of its overseas distributors.
countries such as Italy and Spain. CompanyAttorneys for the company also say that
officials say the FDA lacks evidence to proveShelhigh is "clinging to its life" and
that the products have malfunctioned orbankruptcy  is  looming  large.
caused any injuries or fatalities in
patients. Shelhigh valves are reportedly usedExperts who have watched FDA actions in the
in heart patients of all age groups -past, say Shelhigh's fighting stance is
infants,  older children, adults and seniors.extremely risky. The FDA, they say, has the
power to put a company out of business and
Shelhigh defied a formal FDA request earlierthat the regulatory agencies in Europe and
this month to recall these products. Shlomothe United States are more in tune with each
Gabbay, the company's CEO and chief scienceother  now  than  they  were  ever  before.
officer, says his company "has no intention
to initiate the recall," according to anAmong the products that the FDA asked that
article published in the New JerseyShelhigh  recall,  include  the  following:
Star-Ledger, which has been following the
latest developments in this saga veryMedical devices manufactured by Shelhigh
closely. The newspaper quotes Gabbay, whoinclude: Pericardial Patch, No-React
maintains that the FDA has no facts toPericardial Patch, No-React PneumoPledgets,
support  its  claims  against  his  company.No-React VascuPatch, No-React Tissue Repair
Patch/UroPatch, Pulmonic Valve Conduit
"The FDA should understand that it must proveNo-React Treated, No-React Dura Shield,
its allegations before it can make a requestBioRing (annuloplasty ring), No-React EnCuff
and their newest statements do not providePatch, No-React Stentless Valve Conduit,
any further factual support for theirInternal Mammary Artery, Gold perforated
claims,"  he  told  the  Star-Ledger.patches, Pre Curved Aortic Patch (Open),
NR2000 SemiStented aortic tricuspid valve,
Apparently, this defiance on the part ofBioConduit stentless valve, NR900A tricuspid
Shelhigh is reflective of a trend. While drugvalve, MitroFast Mitral Valve Repair System,
makers are quick to recall a defective drug,BioMitral tricuspid valve and Injectable
device manufacturers are more contentious.Pulmonic Valve System.



1 A B C D 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 84 85 87 88 89 91 92 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 106 107 108 109 110