Cutting Out Managed Care Middleman Reduces Cuts Health Plan Costs

Cutting out the managed care middleman andadministrative tasks. Managed care companies
contracting directly with medical providers mayhave failed to contain employer medical cost
seem like a drastic solution for reducing health planincreases, despite all their so-called network
costs. Yet for employers who've been whipsawedmanagement efforts. Ironically, and coincidentally,
by relentless cost increases, it may be the onlymanaged care industry profits are at an all-time
solution that actually works. The profit-bloatedhigh while employers continue to suffer.Myth 5:
managed care industry, with much to lose, hasDirect contracting exposes employers to greater
propagated many myths about why this sensibleliability. The truth is direct contracting poses no
approach won't work. But their solutions haven'tgreater risk of litigation than any other benefit
worked. Costs continue to surge and employersprogram component and may actually offer
are desperately seeking relief. It's time to debunkgreater protection against it. Direct contracting is
the myths about direct provider contracting andintended only for self-insured employers whose
shed some light on this highly effective, innovativeplans are governed by ERISA, which offers built-in
cost-containment strategy.Myth 1: Employersprotection against liability. ERISA preempts state
cannot negotiate as good a deal with medicaltort laws and limits the employee's ability to hold
providers as can managed care companies. Thean ERISA plan liable for malpractice under state
truth is employers can often negotiate just aslaws, which govern malpractice, not ERISA.
good a deal, or better. Providers welcome directBecause direct provider agreements state the
agreements for the very reason that they areemployer is not providing/directing medical care
not like conventional managed care contracts.and has no role whatsoever in any medical
Physicians have complained for years aboutdecision, the protection offered by ERISA's
adversarial agreements and poor reimbursementspreemption is safely maintained.Myth 6: Managed
forced upon them by HMOs and PPOs. Thiscare companies can't (or won't) process claims for
negative perception has created a strongdirect networks.
willingness among medical providers to do businessThe truth is that processing claims and
directly with employers. These "win-win"administering benefits for employer-owned
agreements ultimately save employers moneyprovider networks are well within the technical
without shortchanging the providers. Unlikecapabilities of managed care companies. Their
managed care companies, direct agreementsfeigned inability to process direct network claims is
disclose all contractual details so both employerone of many ways that managed care companies
and provider know the deal they're getting andhold their employer-clients hostage in networks
nothing can be hidden by a middleman's "cut."Myththat are owned, leased, or arranged by the
2: You need large numbers of employees tomanaged care companies themselves. If an
negotiate direct provider contracts. The truth isexisting managed care company cannot or will not
physicians and hospitals will often contract withadminister direct network claims, there are plenty
employers for limited numbers of employees.of third party administrators (TPAs) than can
When a direct agreement is fair andhandle it, usually at a lower cost per employee.
reimbursement terms are reasonable, providersFor employers that want direct networks in select
quickly realize it's a smart business decision tolocations (but want to keep commercial networks
work with employers in their own community. Aelsewhere), using a TPA is a convenient and
local employer, regardless of size, represents ancost-effective way to get the job done.Myth 7:
established group of existing lives as prospectiveManaged care companies do a better job
patients, ready to use the direct networkcontaining costs and saving employers money. If
providers. Direct networks have been successfullythat was true, employer medical plan costs would
developed in areas where the employer had asbe falling instead of rising. The truth is employers
few as 30 employees.Myth 3: Direct contractingwho have implemented direct provider contracting
won't work in areas where other PPO networksare experiencing lower costs and higher savings.
are available. The truth is doctors are sick ofOne national employer with 20,000 employees has
disadvantageous agreements and miserableused direct networks to keep their health plan
reimbursements forced upon them by managedcost trend flat for the past five years. Another
care companies. They actually welcome themajor employer reduced its health plan costs by
opportunity to contract directly with employers.more than 20% without reducing benefits or
For many doctors, the very fact it's anshifting costs to employees.Bottom Line: Cutting
agreement with the employer, and not aout the managed care middleman and contracting
managed care company, is reason enough todirectly with medical providers can help savvy
participate in a direct network. A directemployers reduce benefit costs and regain control
agreement establishes a true business relationshipover their corporate health care plans.Howard
between provider and employer, one that"A.J." Lester is president of A.J. Lester &
promises the provider quicker reimbursements,Associates, Inc, a leading employee benefits
better benefit payment levels, and easier accessconsulting firm based in Houston, TX that helps
to the ultimate payer (the employer). It's also amajor employers reduce health plan costs by
gesture of good community relations for anydeveloping directly contracted medical provider
physician, medical group, or hospital tonetworks as an alternative to commercial PPOs.
demonstrate.Myth 4: Direct networks createSince 1994, A.J. Lester has developed direct
more administrative burdens and higher costs. Theprovider networks for well-known national
truth is once direct networks are developed, theemployers across 35 states, negotiating
advantages of "owning" a network quicklyagreements with nearly 80,000 physicians and
outweigh "leasing" one from a managed careover 800 hospitals on behalf of clients. A.J. Lester
company. There are no recurring network access& Associates has helped its clients save tens of
fees; less physician attrition; fewer employeemillions of dollars on their health benefit
complaints; simpler self-renewing contracts; betterprograms.Read the Case Studies of employers
provider relationships; straightforward plan designwho have reduced costs through direct provider
features; and the ability to choose the bestcontracting.To help employers understand direct
contractors for utilization review, casecontracting as a cost-reducing strategy, A.J.
management, claims processing, and other