How health care system works
 

Welcome to our health care system Archive!

 

(Browse for more articles)

 

Cutting Out Managed Care Middleman Reduces Cuts Health Plan Costs

Cutting out the managed care middleman administrative tasks. Managed care
and contracting directly with medical companies have failed to contain employer
providers may seem like a drastic medical cost increases, despite all their
solution for reducing health plan costs. so-called network management efforts.
Yet for employers who've been whipsawed Ironically, and coincidentally, managed
by relentless cost increases, it may be care industry profits are at an all-time
the only solution that actually works. high while employers continue to
The profit-bloated managed care industry, suffer.Myth 5: Direct contracting
with much to lose, has propagated many exposes employers to greater liability.
myths about why this sensible approach The truth is direct contracting poses no
won't work. But their solutions haven't greater risk of litigation than any other
worked. Costs continue to surge and benefit program component and may
employers are desperately seeking relief. actually offer greater protection against
It's time to debunk the myths about it. Direct contracting is intended only
direct provider contracting and shed some for self-insured employers whose plans
light on this highly effective, are governed by ERISA, which offers
innovative cost-containment strategy.Myth built-in protection against liability.
1: Employers cannot negotiate as good a ERISA preempts state tort laws and limits
deal with medical providers as can the employee's ability to hold an ERISA
managed care companies. The truth is plan liable for malpractice under state
employers can often negotiate just as laws, which govern malpractice, not
good a deal, or better. Providers ERISA. Because direct provider
welcome direct agreements for the very agreements state the employer is not
reason that they are not like providing/directing medical care and has
conventional managed care contracts. no role whatsoever in any medical
Physicians have complained for years decision, the protection offered by
about adversarial agreements and poor ERISA's preemption is safely
reimbursements forced upon them by HMOs maintained.Myth 6: Managed care
and PPOs. This negative perception has companies can't (or won't) process claims
created a strong willingness among for direct networks.
medical providers to do business directly The truth is that processing claims and
with employers. These "win-win" administering benefits for employer-owned
agreements ultimately save employers provider networks are well within the
money without shortchanging the technical capabilities of managed care
providers. Unlike managed care companies. Their feigned inability to
companies, direct agreements disclose all process direct network claims is one of
contractual details so both employer and many ways that managed care companies
provider know the deal they're getting hold their employer-clients hostage in
and nothing can be hidden by a networks that are owned, leased, or
middleman's "cut."Myth 2: You need large arranged by the managed care companies
numbers of employees to negotiate direct themselves. If an existing managed care
provider contracts. The truth is company cannot or will not administer
physicians and hospitals will often direct network claims, there are plenty
contract with employers for limited of third party administrators (TPAs) than
numbers of employees. When a direct can handle it, usually at a lower cost
agreement is fair and reimbursement terms per employee. For employers that want
are reasonable, providers quickly realize direct networks in select locations (but
it's a smart business decision to work want to keep commercial networks
with employers in their own community. A elsewhere), using a TPA is a convenient
local employer, regardless of size, and cost-effective way to get the job
represents an established group of done.Myth 7: Managed care companies do a
existing lives as prospective patients, better job containing costs and saving
ready to use the direct network employers money. If that was true,
providers. Direct networks have been employer medical plan costs would be
successfully developed in areas where the falling instead of rising. The truth is
employer had as few as 30 employees.Myth employers who have implemented direct
3: Direct contracting won't work in provider contracting are experiencing
areas where other PPO networks are lower costs and higher savings. One
available. The truth is doctors are sick national employer with 20,000 employees
of disadvantageous agreements and has used direct networks to keep their
miserable reimbursements forced upon them health plan cost trend flat for the past
by managed care companies. They actually five years. Another major employer
welcome the opportunity to contract reduced its health plan costs by more
directly with employers. For many than 20% without reducing benefits or
doctors, the very fact it's an agreement shifting costs to employees.Bottom Line:
with the employer, and not a managed care Cutting out the managed care middleman
company, is reason enough to participate and contracting directly with medical
in a direct network. A direct agreement providers can help savvy employers reduce
establishes a true business relationship benefit costs and regain control over
between provider and employer, one that their corporate health care plans.Howard
promises the provider quicker "A.J." Lester is president of A.J. Lester
reimbursements, better benefit payment & Associates, Inc, a leading employee
levels, and easier access to the ultimate benefits consulting firm based in
payer (the employer). It's also a Houston, TX that helps major employers
gesture of good community relations for reduce health plan costs by developing
any physician, medical group, or hospital directly contracted medical provider
to demonstrate.Myth 4: Direct networks networks as an alternative to commercial
create more administrative burdens and PPOs. Since 1994, A.J. Lester has
higher costs. The truth is once direct developed direct provider networks for
networks are developed, the advantages of well-known national employers across 35
"owning" a network quickly outweigh states, negotiating agreements with
"leasing" one from a managed care nearly 80,000 physicians and over 800
company. There are no recurring network hospitals on behalf of clients. A.J.
access fees; less physician attrition; Lester & Associates has helped its
fewer employee complaints; simpler clients save tens of millions of dollars
self-renewing contracts; better provider on their health benefit programs.Read the
relationships; straightforward plan Case Studies of employers who have
design features; and the ability to reduced costs through direct provider
choose the best contractors for contracting.To help employers understand
utilization review, case management, direct contracting as a cost-reducing
claims processing, and other strategy, A.J.




www.rubiconmed.com keyword stats [2007-08-05-2007-08-05]



Daily top traffic source : Google
Most current Google search phrases:

managed care agreements with physicians "healthcare industry structure"
"Miralus Healthcare company"

Other search phrases:

medical supply companies in new healthcare industry revenue
hot jobs in the medical field united healthcare insurance company of
159th medical company hca hospital corporation of america
american medical security life insurance the children`s hospital denver
healthcare insurance companies university of colorado hospital
health insurance companies in washington the medical center of aurora co
first health insurance company jobs in the healthcare field
healthcare travel companies conseco senior health insurance company
the children s hospital denver names of health insurance companies
medical insurance small company top three medical device companies
healthcare recruiter jobs united healthcare insurance company of
the official abms directory of board website design new york
Rubicon Medical Corp.Healthcare size of healthcare industry





1- A- B- C- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- 14- 15- 16- 17- 18- 19- 20- 21- 22- 23- 24- 25- 26- 27- 28- 29- 30- 31- 32- 33- 34- 35- 36- 37- 38- 39- 40- 41- 42- 43- 44- 45- 46- 47-