Cutting Out Managed Care Middleman Cuts Health Plan Costs

Cutting out the managed care middleman andadvantages of "owning" a network quickly
contracting directly with medical providers mayoutweigh "leasing" one from a managed care
seem like a drastic solution for reducing health plancompany. There are no recurring network access
costs. Yet for employers who've been whipsawedfees; less physician attrition; fewer employee
by relentless cost increases, it may be the onlycomplaints; simpler self-renewing contracts; better
solution that actually works. The profit-bloatedprovider relationships; straightforward plan design
managed care industry, with much to lose, hasfeatures; and the ability to choose the best
propagated many myths about why this sensiblecontractors for utilization review, case
approach won't work. But their solutions haven'tmanagement, claims processing, and other
worked. Costs continue to surge and employersadministrative tasks. Managed care companies
are desperately seeking relief. A.J. Lester &have failed to contain employer medical cost
Associates, Inc. has debunked the myths aboutincreases, despite all their so-called network
direct provider contracting, shedding much neededmanagement efforts. Ironically, and coincidentally,
light on this ingenious and innovativemanaged care industry profits are at an all-time
cost-containment strategy.high while employers continue to suffer.
Myth 1: Employers cannot negotiate as good aMyth 5: Direct contracting exposes employers to
deal with medical providers as can managed caregreater liability. The truth is direct contracting
companies. The truth is employers can oftenposes no greater risk of litigation than any other
negotiate just as good a deal, or better. Providersbenefit program component and may actually
welcome direct agreements for the very reasonoffer greater protection against it. Direct
that they are not like conventional managed carecontracting is intended only for self-insured
contracts. Physicians have complained for yearsemployers whose plans are governed by ERISA,
about adversarial agreements and poorwhich offers built-in protection against liability.
reimbursements forced upon them by HMOs andERISA preempts state tort laws and limits the
PPOs. This negative perception has created aemployee's ability to hold an ERISA plan liable for
strong willingness among medical providers to domalpractice under state laws, which govern
business directly with employers. These "win-win"malpractice, not ERISA. Because direct provider
agreements ultimately save employers moneyagreements state the employer is not providing
without shortchanging the providers. Unlikedirecting medical care and has no role whatsoever
managed care companies, direct agreementsin any medical decision, protection afforded by the
disclose all contractual details so both employerERISA preemption is safely maintained.
and provider know the deal they're getting andMyth 6: Managed care companies can't (or won't)
nothing can be hidden by a middleman's "cut."process claims for direct networks. The truth is
Myth 2: You need large numbers of employees tothat processing claims and administering benefits
negotiate direct provider contracts. The truth isfor employer-owned provider networks are well
physicians and hospitals will often contract withwithin the technical capabilities of managed care
employers for limited numbers of employees.companies. Their feigned inability to process direct
When a direct agreement is fair andnetwork claims is one of many ways that
reimbursement terms are reasonable, providersmanaged care companies hold their
quickly realize it's a smart business decision toemployer-clients hostage in networks that are
work with employers in their own community. Aowned, leased, or arranged by the managed care
local employer, regardless of size, represents ancompanies themselves. If an existing managed
established group of existing lives as prospectivecare company cannot or will not administer direct
patients, ready to use the direct networknetwork claims, there are plenty of third party
providers. Direct networks have been successfullyadministrators (TPAs) than can handle it, usually at
developed in areas where the employer had asa lower cost per employee. For employers that
few as 30 employees.want direct networks in select locations (but want
Myth 3: Direct contracting won't work in areasto keep commercial networks elsewhere), using a
where other PPO networks are available. TheTPA is a convenient and cost-effective way to
truth is doctors are sick of disadvantageousget the job done.
agreements and miserable reimbursements forcedMyth 7: Managed care companies do a better job
upon them by managed care companies. Theycontaining costs and saving employers money. If
actually welcome the opportunity to contractthat was true, employer medical plan costs would
directly with employers. For many doctors, thebe falling instead of rising. The truth is employers
very fact it's an agreement with the employer,who have implemented direct provider contracting
and not a managed care company, is reasonare experiencing lower costs and higher savings.
enough to participate in a direct network. A directOne national employer with 20,000 employees has
agreement establishes a true business relationshipused direct networks to keep their health plan
between provider and employer, one thatcost trend flat for the past five years. Another
promises the provider quicker reimbursements,major employer reduced its health plan costs by
better benefit payment levels, and easier accessmore than 20% without reducing benefits or
to the ultimate payer (the employer). It's also ashifting costs to employees.
gesture of good community relations for anyBottom Line: Cutting out the managed care
physician, medical group, or hospital tomiddleman and contracting directly with medical
demonstrate.providers can help savvy employers reduce
Myth 4: Direct networks create morebenefit costs and regain control over their
administrative burdens and higher costs. The truthcorporate health care plans.
is once direct networks are developed, the